基于时空间行为的混合住房社区社会分异的研究框架

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.005

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3645 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要混合住房社区内的社会分异是城市社会分异的新形式，是城市地理学者面临的新研究议题，也是在促进社会融合过程中亟待解决的问题。以居住区分异为核心的研究范式平均化了“邻里效应”，无法揭示同一居住区内部的社会分异。居民时空间行为研究为揭示社区内部的社会分异提供了理论和方法支撑。本文首先回顾混合住房社区政策的起源、发展及学术界关于居住混合与社会融合关系的争议，然后对目前国内外关于混合住房社区的研究进行综述，接着讨论了从时空间行为视角透视社会分异问题的有效性，并基于已有研究进展构建了基于居民时空间行为的混合住房社区社会分异的研究框架，以期为混合住房社区政策制定和城市社区管理提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张雪
	柴彦威

关键词 ：时空间行为, 混合住房社区, 社会分异, 研究框架

Abstract：As a new form of social differentiation, social differentiation in housing mix neighbourhoods is a new research topic faced by urban geographers. Exiting studies have found that residents of different housing types in housing mix neighbourhoods may still face social differentiation due to their different use of urban spaces and few social interactions. However, the research paradigm of conventional social differentiation research has 'The Neighbourhood Effect Averaging Problem' and cannot reveal the social differences within the same neighbourhood. The study of residents' spatial and temporal behavior provides theoretical and methodological support for revealing the social differentiation within a neighbourhood. Therefore, this paper first reviews the origin and development of the housing mix neighborhood policy and the argument on the relationship between housing mix and social integration. Then, it takes a literature review on existing research on housing mix neighborhoods. Based on the existing research progress, a research framework for the social differentiation of the housing mix neighborhood from the residents' behavioral perspective is constructed. On the one hand, the behavior spaces represent the spaces for residents to experience and communicate in daily life. On the other hand, the behavior spaces represent the utilization of different urban spaces by different groups, thus forming "social differentiation in the trajectory of daily life".

Key words： spatio-temporal behavior housing mix neighbourhoods social differentiation research framework

收稿日期: 2021-09-06

PACS:

K901

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（42001186， 42071203）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（20YJCZH234）；清华大学 “水木学者” 计划资助

通讯作者: 柴彦威(1964-),男,甘肃会宁人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要研究方向为时间地理学、行为地理学、城市时空行为规划。E-mail:chyw@pku.edu.cn。 E-mail: chyw@pku.edu.cn

作者简介: 张雪(1989-),女,河北沧州人,博士,助理研究员,主要研究方向为行为地理学、时间地理学、城市与区域规划。E-mail:zhangxuepku@163.com。

引用本文:

张雪, 柴彦威. 基于时空间行为的混合住房社区社会分异的研究框架[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(6): 39-46. ZHANG Xue, CHAI Yan-wei. A RESEARCH FRAMEWORK ON SOCIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF HOUSING MIX NEIGHBOURHOODS BASED ON RESIDENTS' SPATIAL-TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(6): 39-46.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.005 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V37/I6/39

[1]	李志刚,薛德升,魏立华. 欧美城市居住混居的理论、实践与启示[J].城市规划,2007,31(2):38-44. [Li Zhigang, Xue Desheng, Wei Lihua. Housing mix in European and American cities: Theories, application and implication[J]. City Planning Review, 2007,31(2):38-44.]
[2]	孙斌栋,刘学良. 美国混合居住政策及其效应的研究述评——兼论对我国经济适用房和廉租房规划建设的启示[J]. 城市规划学刊,2009,(1):90-97. [Sun Bindong, Liu Xueliang. A review on the research on housing mix policies and its effects in American cities: Its implications to the plan and construction of affordable housing and low-cost housing in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2009,(1):90- 97.]
[3]	Bolt G, Kempen R V. Mixing neighbourhoods: Success or failure? [J]. Cities, 2013,35:391-396.
[4]	Thurber A, Bohmann C R, Heflinger C A. Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being[J]. Urban Studies, 2018,55(9):1859-1874.
[5]	孙斌栋,刘学良.欧洲混合居住政策效应的研究述评及启示[J].国际城市规划,2010,25(5):96-102. [Sun Bindong, Liu Xueliang. The research review and its implications of the policies effects of housing mix in European countries[J]. Urban Planning International, 2010,25(5):96-102.]
[6]	Wilson W J. Another look at the truly disadvantaged[J].Political Science Quarterly, 1991,106(4):639-656.
[7]	曹金淼.保障性住区的混合居住效应研究[J].2018中国城市规划年会论文集,2018:444-451. [Cao Jinmiao. Research on the housing mix effect of affordable housing neighbourhoods[J]. Proceedings of China Urban Planning Annual Conference, 2018:444-451.]
[8]	Wang D G, Li F, Chai Y W. Activity spaces and sociospatial segregation in Beijing[J]. Urban Geography, 2012,33(2):256-277.
[9]	Permentier M, Bolt G, Van H M. Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation[J]. Urban Studies, 2011,48(5):977-996.
[10]	Arthurson K. Mixed tenure communities and the effects on neighbourhood reputation and stigma: Residents' experiences from within [J]. Cities, 2013,35:432-438.
[11]	Chaskin R J, Sichling F, Joseph M L. Youth in mixed-income communities replacing public housing complexes: Context, dynamics and response[J]. Cities, 2013,35:423-431.
[12]	Bretherton J, Pleace N. A difficult mix: Issues in achieving socioeconomic diversity in deprived UK neighbourhoods[J]. Urban Studies, 2011,48(16):3433-3447.
[13]	Mugnano S, Palvarini P. "Sharing space without hanging together": A case study of social mix policy in Milan[J]. Cities, 2013,35:417- 422.
[14]	Bolt G, Van K R. Successful mixing? Effects of urban restructuring policies in Dutch neighbourhoods[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2011,102(3):361-368.
[15]	张璐. 促进混合居住实现社会融合——保障性住房建设策略研究[J]. 住区,2016,(1):46-51.[Zhang Lu. Mixed habitation and social integration: Construction strategy of public housing[J].Design Community, 2016,(1):46-51.]
[16]	陈喆,李笺. 北京不同阶层混合居住模式建构研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2012,(S1):152-156.[Chen Zhe, Li Jian. Research on the construction of mixed residential model of different stratums in Beijing[J]. Architectural Journal, 2012,(S1):152-156.]
[17]	舒煜存. 大型混合居住社区的规划设计实践——以上海市宝山区庙行镇场北村共康北二块住宅项目为例[J]. 住宅科技,2012, 32(4): 1-6. [Shu Yucun. Practice on planning and design of large complex residential community: Taking two residential projects on North Gongkang, Changbei Village, Miaohang Town, Baoshan District, Shanghai[J]. Housing Science, 2012,32(4):1-6.]
[18]	胡小强.广州市混合居住社区的发展及其内部居住分异研究[D]. 广州:中山大学,2008. [Hu Xiaoqiang. Research on the Evolution and Interior Residential Segregation of Mix Housing Communities in Guangzhou City[D].Guangzhou: Sun Yat-Sen University, 2008.]
[19]	Graves E M. Mixed outcome developments: Comparing policy goals to resident outcomes in mixed-income housing[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2011,77(2):143-153.
[20]	Tach L M. More than bricks and mortar: Neighborhood frames, social processes, and the mixed-income redevelopment of a public housing project[J].City and Community, 2009,8(3):269-299.
[21]	Joseph M, Chaskin R. Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago[J]. Urban Studies, 2010,47(11):2347-2366.
[22]	Chaskin R J, Joseph M L. Building community in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2010,45(3):299-335.
[23]	Chaskin R J, Joseph M L. Social interaction in mixed-income developments: Relational expectations and emerging reality[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2011,33(2):209-237.
[24]	Chaskin R J, Joseph M L. "Positive" gentrification, social control and the "right to the city" in mixed-income communities: Uses and expectations of space and place[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2013,37(2):480-502.
[25]	Fraser J C, Chaskin R J, Bazuin J T. Making mixed-income neighbourhoods work for low-income households[J]. Cityscape, 2013, 15(2):83-100.
[26]	Arthurson K. Australian public housing and the diverse histories of social mix[J]. Journal of Urban History, 2008,34(3):484-501.
[27]	Fogel S J, Smith M T, Williamson A R. Creating new patterns of social and economic activity through planned housing environments: HOPE VI and neighborhood transformation[J]. Journal of Community Practice, 2007, 15(4): 97-115.
[28]	Perkins D D, Hughey J, Speer P W. Community psychology perspectives on social capital theory and community development practice[J]. Community Development, 2002,33(1):33-52.
[29]	Sin R, Krysan M. What is racial residential integration? A research synthesis, 1950—2013[J]. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 2015, 1(4):467-474.
[30]	Keller J D. Experiences of public housing residents following relocation: Explorations of ambiguous loss, resiliency, and crossgenerational perspectives[J]. Journal of Poverty, 2011,15(2):141-163.
[31]	Smrekar C E, Bentley L. HOPE VI neighbourhoods and neighbourhood schools: Understanding how revitalized neighbourhoods influence school environments[J]. Peabody Journal of Education, 2011, 86(4):416-435.
[32]	Schnell I, Benjamini Y. Globalisation and the structure of urban social space: The lesson from Tel Aviv[J]. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(13):2489-2510.
[33]	Åslund O, Skans O N. Will I see you at work? Ethnic workplace segregation in Sweden, 1985—2002[J]. ILR Review, 2010, 63(3): 471-493.
[34]	Schnell I, Yoav B. The sociospatial isolation of agents in everyday life spaces as an aspect of segregation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2001,91(4):622-636.
[35]	Ellis M, Wright R, Parks V. Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004,94(3):620-637.
[36]	Shareck M, Kestens Y, Frohlich K L. Moving beyond the residential neighborhood to explore social inequalities in exposure to arealevel disadvantage: Results from the interdisciplinary study on inequalities in smoking[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2014, 108: 106-114.
[37]	Kwan M-P. Beyond space (as we knew it):Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility: Spacetime integration in geography and GIScience[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013,103(5):1078-1086.
[38]	Kwan M-P. The limits of the neighborhood effect: Contextual uncertainties in geographic, environmental health, and social science research[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2018,108(6):1482-1490.
[39]	Kwan M-P. The neighborhood effect averaging problem (NEAP): An elusive confounder of the neighborhood effect[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018,15(9): 1841.
[40]	Park Y M, Kwan M-P. Beyond residential segregation: A spatiotemporal approach to examining multi-contextual segregation[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2018,71:98-108.
[41]	柴彦威.城市地理学思想与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:194- 220.[Chai Yanwei. Urban Geography Thoughts and Methodologies [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012:194-220.]
[42]	Li F, Wang D G. Measuring urban segregation based on individuals' daily activity patterns: A multidimensional approach[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2017,49(2):467-486.
[43]	Wong D w s, Shaw S L. Measuring segregation: An activity space approach[J]. Journal of geographical Systems, 2011,13(2):127-145.
[44]	Jones M, Pebley A R. Redefining neighborhoods using common destinations: Social characteristics of activity spaces and home census tracts compared[J]. Demography, 2014,51(3):727-752.
[45]	Yamamoto T, Kitamura R. An analysis of time allocation to inhome and out-of-home discretionary activities across working days and non-working days[J]. Transportation, 1999,26(2):231-250.
[46]	Lu X, Pas E I. Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior[J]. Transportation Research A: Policy and practice, 1999, 33(1):1-18.
[47]	Wang D G, Chai Y W, Li F. Built environment diversities and activity-travel behaviour variations in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011,19(6):1173-1186.
[48]	周素红,邓丽芳.基于T-GIS的广州市居民日常活动时空关系[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12): 1454-1463. [Zhou Suhong, Deng Lifang. Spatio-temporal pattern of residents 'daily activities based on TGIS: A case study in Guangzhou, China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(12):1454-1463.]
[49]	Atkinson R, Flint J. Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time-space trajectories of segregation[J]. Housing Studies, 2004,19(6):875-892.
[50]	Schönfelder S, Axhausen K W. Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion?[J]. Transport Policy, 2003,10(4):273-286.
[51]	Zenk S N, Schulz A J, Matthews S A, et al. Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: A pilot study[J]. Health & Place, 2011,17(5):1150-1161.
[52]	Zhang X, Wang J, Kwan M-P, et al. Reside nearby, behave apart? Activity-space-based segregation among residents of various types of housing in Beijing, China[J]. Cities, 2019,88:166-180.
[53]	Järv O, Müürisepp K, Ahas R, et al. Ethnic differences in activity spaces as a characteristic of segregation: A study based on mobile phone usage in Tallinn, Estonia[J]. Urban Studies, 2015, 52(14): 2680-2698.
[54]	Lee JY, Kwan M-P. Visualisation of socio-spatial isolation based on human activity patterns and social networks in space-time[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2011,102(4):468- 485.
[55]	Wang D G, Li F. Daily activity space and exposure: A comparative study of Hong Kong's public and private housing residents' segregation in daily life[J]. Cities, 2016,59:148-155.
[56]	张雪,李彦熙,柴彦威.多情境下城市时空间行为的社会分异—— 以北京不同住房来源居民为例[J]. 人文地理,2021,36(6):39-52. [Zhang Xue, Li Yanxi, Chai Yanwei. Social segregation of spatiotemporal behavior of residents of different types of housing in complex contexts: A case study of Beijing[J].Human Geography, 2021, 36(6):39-52.]
[57]	柴彦威, Kajsa Ellegård, 张艳.“新” 时间地理学专栏导言[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(5): 17-18, 31. [Chai Yanwei, Kajsa Ellegård, Zhang Yan. Introduction of "new" time geography[J]. Human Geography, 2016,31(5):17-18,31.]